Monday, June 7, 2010

Meat-eating brahmins

World-over, people are realizing the positives of following a vegetarian diet. It is a very Indian concept. One would definitely not eat beef.
- two people - the President and the Prime Minister of India are pure vegetarians and have taken pains to maintain their vegetarian habits even in alien land,
but
Mr. Mani Shankar Iyer, a Tamil Brahmin, has proclaimed proudly that he is a meat-eater and has challenged others to consume more meat than him.

Again, a case of Brahmins being most anti-brahminical. I am sure such persons like Mr. Mani Shankar Aiyer and their deeds will tarnish the image of Brahmins in society. One should stick to principles and not surrender them merely for some cheap materialistic gains.

Full text of the article;

All the president's cooks


There’s a story that’s told of a staunch Hindutva leader who, while once travelling abroad in the tireless service of the motherland, was seen to be heartily tucking into a juicy beef steak. When other members of the delegation, who were more used to seeing the beef-eater as a swadeshi campaigner against cow slaughter, enquired of him if he knew what manner of beast he was devouring, his response was as comical as it was honest. “Yes, I know it’s gomata,” he said in chaste Hindi. “But this is a videshi gomata!”

Many a politician has yielded too readily to the temptation of forbidden pleasures of the flesh on overseas sojourns. Perhaps the mere fact of crossing immigration control serves to sever the umbilical cord that binds them to home-grown notions of propriety, lends a frisky jauntiness to their step and gets them salivating.
But president Pratibha Patil is manifestly made of firmer mettle.

On her recent visit to China, Patil, who is irremediably vegetarian, even travelled with her own entourage of cooks, groceries and — I kid you not — cooking utensils, and stuck to a spartan fare of dal-chawal-sabzi even at the state banquets organised in her honour. Patil’s steadfast abidance by her preferred dietary regimen may have endeared her to the Dal Chawal Sabzi Sabha (Oh, I’m sure there’s one such), but it also effectively served to reinforce cultural stereotypes — in China and elsewhere — of Indians as extremely fussy people to eat with or host because they come with a mile-long list of food taboos.

And to think that this was a ‘goodwill tour’, to a country where more goodwill is typically generated by breaking bread around banquet tables than by framing anodyne statements about ‘mutual understanding’!


Not for a minute am I suggesting that Patil should perhaps have surrendered herself to some exotic Chinese delicacies in the cause of improved Sino-Indian relations. But to bring a retinue of your own cooks and kadais (which were probably mass-manufactured in a factory in Zhejiang province in the first place) just seems a trifle excessive.

It isn’t just about President Patil. Even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in whose honour US President Barack Obama hosted a White House banquet last year, is a colossally boring teetotaller and vegetarian, with a marked preference for kadi chawal, curd rice and bland Punjabi food!

The bigger point here is that India isn’t drawing the full merits of the ‘dinner diplomacy’ circuit because it has a plateful of geriatric leaders whose gastronomic indulgences are limited to ghas-phus.

Mercifully, not all our leaders are such boring ‘food ambassadors’. Patil’s predecessor, Abdul Kalam, too, was a teetotaller and a vegetarian, but in the ‘food diplomacy’ stakes, he played admirable offence, and was a brand ambassador for the south Indian vada. Historians have recorded that while on a state visit to Iceland some years ago, he advertised the tasty goodness of the sambar-vada to Nordic plenipotentiaries, and won quite a few converts.

My all-time favourite story involving Indian politicians and food relates to Mani Shankar Aiyar’s dare, while campaigning for an election in 1991, to his opponent who was baiting him with anti-Brahmin rhetoric. Aiyar projected himself as a “meat-eating Brahmin” and even challenged his rival to a contest in the village square to see who could eat more chicken biryani. His campaign’s masala recipe went down well, and he won the election. I can readily imagine how, if he had been in Patil’s place in Beijing, president Aiyar would have spiced up Sino-Indian relations with his chicken biryani recipe.

Of course, not all stories involving banqueting presidents are as bland as Manmohan Singh’s preference of Punjabi food or as lacking in drama as Patil’s dinner in Beijing. During a visit to Washington in 1995, Russian president Boris Yeltsin, who was given to late-night drinking sessions, was found near the White House clad only in his underwear and trying to hail a taxi because he wanted a pizza!. On another occasion, in Stockholm in 1997, he made a slurred, rambling speech, gulped down a glassful of champagne, and almost keeled over from the podium.

Perhaps Yeltsin and Patil could both draw inspiration from a uniquely Chinese idea to enliven state banquets without being overly boisterous or colossal killjoys. Local-level Communist Party officials in China are required to host countless banquets to maintain their social standing, and in recent years, many of them died of excessive alcohol consumption.

At which point, they began to appoint ‘drinking assistants’, who would raise toasts on their behalf — so the leaders themselves could live to host another banquet. Perhaps Patil and Manmohan Singh can appoint ‘food ambassadors’ to stand in for them at banquets. Any volunteers in this selfless service of the motherland?

A Brahmin says - Hindus can be terrorists too: Pallavi Gupta

A Brahmin says - Hindus can be terrorists too. The person who made this statement is Pallavi Gupta, a Brahmin and she is playing the role of a dalit in a serial. As i mentioned earlier, the enemy is never outside. He is always within, especially for brahmins.

I found this startling interview ith Pallavi at

One wonders how things are twisted and misrepresented.
First, i am not sure how many of us are comfortable sharing utensils with anyone else. I think its a question of hygiene.
Coming to the question of marriage, Pallavi says that she doesn't care about the caste. Let me put a simple question. If a brahmin girl(so used to vegetarian, liquour-free environment) steps into someone else's residence as a bahu, will she feel at home? The customs which each group follows is different and to get used to some other set of customs is a pain for all concerned and makes one feel out of place.

Some Famous Brahmins - Vijay Mallya

The Brahmin community has a fair share of famous people. However, I doubt if he is proud about being a Brahmin and whether he has contributed anything to the community. Also, the rich and the famous make it a point to appear non-Brahminical to make themselves acceptable to the media and the new society.
Industrialist Vijay Mallaya is the UB group chairman and owner of King-fisher airlines. He is also a Rajya Sabha MP and is trying for a renomination. He is also owner of the Royal Challengers Bangalore and a F1 team(Formula1).

He is a Goud Saraswat Brahmin (Karnataka). I tried desperately to look for any contribution he has made to the Brahmin community but ended with no success.

Two news items have appeared recently about Mr. Mallya;


News Item - Brahmins have become the Dalits

Source: http://expressbuzz.com/opinion/op-ed/brahmins-have-become-the-dalits/176601.html

The article by François Gautier is really a wonderful analysis of the situation in which the Brahmins in India are facing. People concoct history to talk about the domination of Brahmins. On the other hand, the same people will ask us to look at the future when we point out the historic barbaric acts of other religions. Let us realize that
  • There could be a few rich Brahmins but the vast majority of the few Brahmins left in India are either middle-class or in abject poverty.
  • The Brahmin population is decreasing whereas the population of non-Hindus is registering a steep growth.
  • The number of Brahmin leaders is also decreasing commensurate to the dwindling Brahmin numbers.
Full text of the article:
The caste system has been the most vilified aspect of Hindu society at the hands of Western scholars. And this has greatly contributed to India’s lack of national pride, as you hardly find any Indian who is not ashamed of caste, especially if he talks to a Westerner. Much of this shame originated with the idea that it was the Aryans who devised the caste system. And thus English missionaries and later, American preachers, were able to convert tribes and low caste Hindus by telling them : “ you, the aborigines, the tribals, the Harijans, are the original inhabitants of India, and you should discard Hinduism, the religion of the Aryans and embrace, Christianity, the true religion”.

Thus was born the great Aryan invasion theory, of two civilisations, that of the low caste Dravidians and the high caste Aryans, always pitted against each other — which has endured, as it is still today being used by some Indian politicians. It has also been enshrined in all history books — Western, and unfortunately also Indian, although all the latest linguistic, archaeological and satellite mapping, show that there never was an Aryan invasion. This theory has also made Indians look westwards, instead of taking pride in their past and present achievements.

Yet, once upon a time, caste was an arrangement for the distribution of functions in society, just as much as class in Europe, but the principle on which this distribution was based was unique and adapted to India’s social needs. It is true that the caste system degenerated and that it bred exploitation and abuses, which were often unforgivable. But look at today: it is the Brahmins who have become the Dalits of India. Brahmins are in minority in most of the UP villages, where Dalits constitute 60 to 65 per cent ; most of the intellectual Brahmin Tamil class has emigrated outside Tamil Nadu; the average income of Brahmins is less than that of non-Brahmins; a high percentage of Brahmin students drop out at the intermediate level ; 75 per cent of domestic help and cooks in Andhra Pradesh are Brahmins; and most of Delhi’s public toilets are cleaned by Brahmins (Brahmins of India by J. Radhakrishna, published by Chugh Publications, 2007).

It is also true that India has been trying to get away from the caste system in the last 60 years. And with some success: it is difficult today to distinguish the upper caste from the Dalit, in a plane, an hotel or shopping mall. The government has also implemented many schemes that did successfully empower the lower castes both at the educational and social level, even if this system has sometime been perverted. But the people who demand today a caste census, do not want it to alleviate caste and poverty. They want it because in today’s India, it is enough to have the voices of the Muslims and the Dalits to be elected. It is at best a cynical ploy, and at worst one that will hurt India and divide it more and more as the British had wished.

What is sure is that if there is a caste census, the greatest sufferers will be the ‘other’ non-Dalit Hindus, who constitute nearly 40 per cent of the Hindu community (unfortunately they are hopelessly divided). Indeed, we live today in an India where Hindus, the overwhelming majority of this country, are treated like an inconsequential minority. An India, where it’s okay to free the two Muslims convicted by the Mumbai police for helping in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, but where Swami Nityananda, a grown-up adult, who had consensual sex with a grown-up woman, is thrown in jail. An India, where the so called-Hindu terrorists of Malegaon, or Ajmer, languish in prison without ever having been convicted, but where those guilty of having killed so many people in the German Bakery of Pune, have never been caught, as there is no political will to do so. An India, where many institutions have been subverted by the Government to the point that in exchange for Mayawati’s support in the recent cut motion, the CBI lifted all cases against her. An India which is supposed to be the largest democracy in the world, but where phones are tapped, where politicians who take thousands of crores as bribes, get away with it, and where people are scared to speak aloud. An India where Sir Mark Tully (who most definitely wrote Hindutva, Sex & Adventures), is considered an icon of ‘fair’ journalism, whereas, when he was BBC’s correspondent, he set standards in reporting on South Asia, which still stand today and harm India’s image. Even though since the mid-Eighties, Pakistan encouraged, financed, trained and armed Kashmiri separatism, Tully always made it a point to say: “India accuses Pakistan to foster separatism in Kashmir”; or : “elections are being held in Indian- held Kashmir”; or “Kashmir militants ” have attacked an army post, instead of “terrorists”. All the other foreign journalists, yesterday and today have followed the BBC’s benchmarks.

This hostile attitude, pioneered by the BBC, may have also partially influenced President Obama’s South Asia policy, whereas he thinks he can fight terror by making a frontline state of the very country which fosters three-fourths of the terror attacks in the world. He is also tightening the screws on India so that it negotiates with Pakistan, even at the cost of compromising on its sovereignty in Kashmir. Obama is finally pressuring Manmohan Singh to give up India’s military nuclear programme, leaving it at the mercy of not only Pakistan’s, but also China’s formidable nuclear arsenal. The government may have come to a secret agreement with US on all these points. The caste census is just another ploy to subvert democracy in the name of democracy.

fgautier26@gmail.com

Latest News - Plea filed against rituals during HC event

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/opinions/6015945.cms

The article cited above refers to the PIL filed by an organization called the 'Centre for Social Justice' objecting to a 'Hindu Brahmin' performing rituals during the foundation stone laying ceremony for a Court building in Gujarat.

In this context, I would like to highlight to the readers that senates of various states in the United States of America are commencing their sessions with Vedic Prayers. I am sure they must have permitted the prayers only after trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the prayers. One must always remember that the Vedas and Vedic thoughts are for the welfare of the entire mankind.

This being the case, it is really surprising to see the trend in India where anything anti-Hindu and anti-Brahmin is viewed as good and anything Brahminical is wrong. Unfortunately, the true enemy of the Brahmin is sometimes the so-called intellectual and elitist Brahmins.
Let us resolve and strive to help each other.

Full text of the news item:
AHMEDABAD: A PIL has been filed in the Supreme Court against the religious rituals performed during a judiciary's function, particularly by the Gujarat High Court on its foundation day. The PIL has urged the SC to declare the foundation stone laying ceremony by performing religious rituals at the high court premises as unconstitutional.

A rights-based organisation, Council for Social Justice (CSJ) has filed the PIL challenging the ceremony of laying foundation stone of an auditorium in the high court premises as per the Hindu rituals. The apex court has kept hearing on this plea after the summer vacation.

On May 1, the high court's foundation day, governor Dr Kamla laid the foundation stone of the auditorium that is to be built in the extended campus at Sola. The ceremony was performed by a Hindu Brahmin and religious rituals were performed in presence of the judges of the high court, other members of Gujarat judiciary and three judges of the apex court.

Before the ceremony took place, CSJ made a representation before the chief justices of HC, as well as, SC urging them to prevent performance of religious rituals looking at the fact that India is a secular country and following rituals of a particular religion is against the spirit of the Constitution. But the high court went ahead with the programme.

CSJ later filed a PIL in the SC urging that the performance of religious rituals at the foundation stone laying ceremony by the high court should be declared as unconstitutional. The apex court has also been requested to direct the state judiciary not to arrange such ritualistic programmes in future, said CSJ secretary Valjibhai Patel.

Why this blog

The role of Brahmin in today's world has changed. The brahmins are facing complex and peculiar situations. There is a need to become aware, be watchful, introspect, network. There cannot be inertia. By this blog, I would like to;
  • keep track of news items related to Brahmins
  • have discussions on the contemporary issues pertaining to Brahmins
  • serve as a networking site for Brahmins
  • build resources (especially online) for the welfare and development of Brahmins
  • act as an intellectual info. generation mechanism