The article by François Gautier is really a wonderful analysis of the situation in which the Brahmins in India are facing. People concoct history to talk about the domination of Brahmins. On the other hand, the same people will ask us to look at the future when we point out the historic barbaric acts of other religions. Let us realize that
- There could be a few rich Brahmins but the vast majority of the few Brahmins left in India are either middle-class or in abject poverty.
- The Brahmin population is decreasing whereas the population of non-Hindus is registering a steep growth.
- The number of Brahmin leaders is also decreasing commensurate to the dwindling Brahmin numbers.
Full text of the article:
The caste system has been the most vilified aspect of Hindu society at the hands of Western scholars. And this has greatly contributed to India’s lack of national pride, as you hardly find any Indian who is not ashamed of caste, especially if he talks to a Westerner. Much of this shame originated with the idea that it was the Aryans who devised the caste system. And thus English missionaries and later, American preachers, were able to convert tribes and low caste Hindus by telling them : “ you, the aborigines, the tribals, the Harijans, are the original inhabitants of India, and you should discard Hinduism, the religion of the Aryans and embrace, Christianity, the true religion”.
Thus was born the great Aryan invasion theory, of two civilisations, that of the low caste Dravidians and the high caste Aryans, always pitted against each other — which has endured, as it is still today being used by some Indian politicians. It has also been enshrined in all history books — Western, and unfortunately also Indian, although all the latest linguistic, archaeological and satellite mapping, show that there never was an Aryan invasion. This theory has also made Indians look westwards, instead of taking pride in their past and present achievements.Yet, once upon a time, caste was an arrangement for the distribution of functions in society, just as much as class in Europe, but the principle on which this distribution was based was unique and adapted to India’s social needs. It is true that the caste system degenerated and that it bred exploitation and abuses, which were often unforgivable. But look at today: it is the Brahmins who have become the Dalits of India. Brahmins are in minority in most of the UP villages, where Dalits constitute 60 to 65 per cent ; most of the intellectual Brahmin Tamil class has emigrated outside Tamil Nadu; the average income of Brahmins is less than that of non-Brahmins; a high percentage of Brahmin students drop out at the intermediate level ; 75 per cent of domestic help and cooks in Andhra Pradesh are Brahmins; and most of Delhi’s public toilets are cleaned by Brahmins (Brahmins of India by J. Radhakrishna, published by Chugh Publications, 2007).It is also true that India has been trying to get away from the caste system in the last 60 years. And with some success: it is difficult today to distinguish the upper caste from the Dalit, in a plane, an hotel or shopping mall. The government has also implemented many schemes that did successfully empower the lower castes both at the educational and social level, even if this system has sometime been perverted. But the people who demand today a caste census, do not want it to alleviate caste and poverty. They want it because in today’s India, it is enough to have the voices of the Muslims and the Dalits to be elected. It is at best a cynical ploy, and at worst one that will hurt India and divide it more and more as the British had wished.What is sure is that if there is a caste census, the greatest sufferers will be the ‘other’ non-Dalit Hindus, who constitute nearly 40 per cent of the Hindu community (unfortunately they are hopelessly divided). Indeed, we live today in an India where Hindus, the overwhelming majority of this country, are treated like an inconsequential minority. An India, where it’s okay to free the two Muslims convicted by the Mumbai police for helping in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, but where Swami Nityananda, a grown-up adult, who had consensual sex with a grown-up woman, is thrown in jail. An India, where the so called-Hindu terrorists of Malegaon, or Ajmer, languish in prison without ever having been convicted, but where those guilty of having killed so many people in the German Bakery of Pune, have never been caught, as there is no political will to do so. An India, where many institutions have been subverted by the Government to the point that in exchange for Mayawati’s support in the recent cut motion, the CBI lifted all cases against her. An India which is supposed to be the largest democracy in the world, but where phones are tapped, where politicians who take thousands of crores as bribes, get away with it, and where people are scared to speak aloud. An India where Sir Mark Tully (who most definitely wrote Hindutva, Sex & Adventures), is considered an icon of ‘fair’ journalism, whereas, when he was BBC’s correspondent, he set standards in reporting on South Asia, which still stand today and harm India’s image. Even though since the mid-Eighties, Pakistan encouraged, financed, trained and armed Kashmiri separatism, Tully always made it a point to say: “India accuses Pakistan to foster separatism in Kashmir”; or : “elections are being held in Indian- held Kashmir”; or “Kashmir militants ” have attacked an army post, instead of “terrorists”. All the other foreign journalists, yesterday and today have followed the BBC’s benchmarks.This hostile attitude, pioneered by the BBC, may have also partially influenced President Obama’s South Asia policy, whereas he thinks he can fight terror by making a frontline state of the very country which fosters three-fourths of the terror attacks in the world. He is also tightening the screws on India so that it negotiates with Pakistan, even at the cost of compromising on its sovereignty in Kashmir. Obama is finally pressuring Manmohan Singh to give up India’s military nuclear programme, leaving it at the mercy of not only Pakistan’s, but also China’s formidable nuclear arsenal. The government may have come to a secret agreement with US on all these points. The caste census is just another ploy to subvert democracy in the name of democracy.fgautier26@gmail.com
It is a pity that Brahmins with their higher average intelligence have become pawns in the Indian system because of what can be called politely as cowardice and self centric interest of individual brahmins. Please read below my comments to The Hindu on an abusive comment on Brahmins by one Sudipto Mondal. It is a shame that he would get away with it.
ReplyDelete_______________
With reference to the article in "The Hindu" dated Sunday, July 8, 2012, Bangalore Edition, titled "India's IT powerhouse is mired in social justice".
While there is social prejudice in rental or sale of properties, Sudipto Mondal's statement stating that if somebody advertised for "Brahmins only" instead of "Vegetarians only" he can be booked under IPC and SC/ST act shows how ill informed Sudipto is. First of all such an intimidating statement is probably the basic reason for bias against some sections of society by some other sections of society. It is pitiable that Sudipto is trying to intimidate Brahmins with his article.
The act of renting a premise is the owner's choice unless his property is stuck with rent control act. So his choice of tenant can be anything and beyond the scope of any IPC. There is no reservation for SC/ST in private rental or sale of properties.
Such a reprehensible statement from Mr Mondal will only alienate more sections of society against one another. I am surprised "The Hindu" has allowed such a material to be published. I am sure it can be treated as an intimidation against Brahmins and can be taken to court. It would be appropriate for "The Hindu" to apologise to readers for this misinformation and for allowing publication of such statements which spreads communal hatred.
------------
As a community if we continue to be silent a time will come when someone will say your daughter is reserved and one out of 4 daughters will have to marry an SC/ST and 2 to OBCs and only one can marry by general merit.
Just my 2cents view.